New Conflict of Interest on Financial Regulatory System in US

House and Senate negotiators voted on Tuesday to strike off new conflict-of-interest rules for credit rating groups out of a far-reaching revamp of the nation’s monetary regulatory set up, leaving in place a procedure that a lot of analysts say added to the propagation of concerned mortgage-backed securities that were a cause of the 2008 fiscal catastrophe.

Senator Al Franken, Democrat of Minnesota, had done well on an offer that would end a longstanding performance of banks choosing the rating agencies, like Moody’s Investors Service or Standard & Poor’s, that assess the securities that they issue.

Mr. Franken and other reviewers of the procedure said that having the banks select and pay the ratings firms created a direct conflict of interest.

Mr. Franken could be successful in winning brawny bipartisan support to take in his proposal in the Senate edition of the legislation. His amendment was accepted by a vote of 64 to 35.

However, a number of the chief sponsors of the regulatory overhaul, which includes Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts and Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, and Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and Chairman of the banking committee, had not supported the offered idea.